I thought I was done talking about drone aircraft for a while, until I read a recent article in the Los Angeles Times. According to the article, the U.S. Navy is testing a new drone that will be able to take off, complete a mission, and land autonomously, that is, without any human pilot whatsoever.

If this report is true, then the Navy’s Northrop Grumman X-47B represents quite a technological step forward from the current crop of drones, which rely on ground-based pilots to fly them. It also introduces a new element into the military chain of command. Just who is accountable if this deadly robotic weapon with a computer mind of its own kills someone, friend or foe, whether by intention or by mistake?

Remotely piloted drone aircraft are now routinely employed against al-Qaeda terrorists in Afghanistan and other countries, and President Obama’s proposed defense budget suggests an even greater reliance on them in the future. I personally support the increased development and deployment of drone aircraft, though I am concerned that fully autonomous weapons introduce new political and moral issues that we as a nation will need to address before these weapons are introduced to the battlefield.

* * *

In a related article, I was interested to read that cutbacks in the defense budget may lead the Pentagon to shelve the high-tech Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk drone aircraft for the foreseeable future. The price for each Global Hawk drone is $176 million. Deputy Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter went on record last week, saying that the RQ-4 drone has “…priced itself out of the niche, in terms of taking pictures in the air. That’s a disappointment for us, but that’s the fate of things that become too expensive in a resource-constrained environment.”

The result is that the military will likely keep the Air Force’s fleet of 33 Lockheed U-2 spy planes flying through at least the next decade or longer. I wouldn’t be surprised to see other innovative new (and expensive) weapons systems shelved in favor of existing technology.

* * *

I was recently interviewed for an article that appeared in the January 23, 2012 issue of the San Diego Business Journal. In the article I discuss some of the things that made SAIC uniquely successful, including attracting and recruiting high-caliber talent by offering opportunities to become owners of the company.

* * *

Last Wednesday we made a field trip to Balboa Park here in San Diego. We visited museums and had a nice lunch at The Prado. I hope to go back soon to visit the Air and Space Museum. On Friday we went out on the boat and had lunch at Sally’s restaurant at the Manchester Hyatt on San Diego Bay. They have their own dock, which made our visit very pleasant.

– Bob


Add to Google Homepage or Google Feed Reader
What is RSS?
Receive email alerts

April 2024
M T W T F S S
« May    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  


Recent Posts


Recent Comments

  • Jim Russell: Some 45 years ago in early 1972, I flew out to La Jolla and met with Dr. Beyster to decide whether to...
  • Edgar Cruz: In the 14 years I served at SAIC, I learned from people who knew Dr. Beyster personally, that employee...
  • Paul Hobin: I’ll always remember the awkward, somewhat apologetic explanations for Dr. Beyster’s low pay...
  • Steve Purcell: Well said Mr. Berg!! Dr. Beyster left a big imprint on many of us. Best to all and keep on making a...
  • Bob Berg: Like so many other thousands of people, my life was incredibly and positively changed by “Dr....